Coordination between the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology in the Management of Madrasah EMIS to Ensure Accuracy of National Education Planning

Authors

  • Uripah Uripah Universitas 17 Augustus 1945 Semarang
  • Indra Kertati Universitas 17 Augustus 1945 Semarang
  • Charis Christiani Universitas 17 Augustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v3i1.687

Keywords:

Data Interoperability, Evidence-Based Policy Making (EBPM), One Data Indonesia (Presidential Decree 39/2019), Ministry of Education, Sectoral Ego (Departmentalism)

Abstract

This study examines coordination between the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the Ministry of Education Culture Research and Technology in managing the Madrasah Education Management Information System EMIS. The main issue is data asynchrony that affects the accuracy of national education planning including budget allocation and the distribution of educational social assistance. This study uses Interorganizational Coordination Theory by B Guy Peters and Collaborative Governance by Ansell and Gash. A qualitative approach was used to analyze the data integration process and bureaucratic obstacles in inter institutional relations.

The findings show that coordination between the two ministries influences the accuracy of national education planning. However the coordination is still dominated by a formal administrative approach and has not yet achieved substantive collaboration. The main obstacles include sectoral ego low interoperability of information systems and weak data sharing mechanisms. These conditions lead to data redundancy and information gaps that reduce the quality of policy making. Strengthening coordination through facilitative leadership digital integration across ministries and system automation based on interoperability is needed to improve the accuracy of national education planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bappenas. (2020). Pedoman perencanaan pembangunan nasional berbasis data. Jakarta: Kementerian PPN/Bappenas

Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275256

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006a). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006b). New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2014). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data at scale. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers, and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 tentang rencana strategis Kementerian Agama tahun 2020-2024.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2021). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Nomor 6075 Tahun 2021 tentang prosedur operasional standar pengelolaan data pendidikan Islam (EMIS).

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 83 Tahun 2022 tentang pengelolaan data pendidikan di lingkungan Kementerian Agama.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Kebijakan penganggaran berbasis kinerja. Jakarta: Kemenkeu RI.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2010). Whole-of-government approaches to public service delivery. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2015). Data-driven public sector: Enabling the strategic use of data for productive, inclusive, and trustworthy governance. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019a). Education policy outlook 2019: Working together to help students achieve their potential. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019b). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. OECD Publishing.

Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102

Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination. University Press of Kansas.

Peters, B. G. (2018a). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946

Peters, B. G. (2018b). The politics of bureaucracy (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653-5

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.

Scholl, H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8-9), 889-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701402668

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Setiawan, A. (2019). Evaluasi sistem Education Management Information System (EMIS) pada madrasah di lingkungan Kementerian Agama. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 26(2), 145-158.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.

UNESCO. (2018). Data for sustainable development: Improving the quality and use of education data. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

Wahyudi, R. (2021). Efektivitas pemanfaatan dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) pada madrasah. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 14(1), 67-82.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07

How to Cite

Uripah Uripah, Indra Kertati, & Charis Christiani. (2026). Coordination between the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology in the Management of Madrasah EMIS to Ensure Accuracy of National Education Planning. Digital Innovation : International Journal of Management, 3(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v3i1.687