Competency and Sustainability Integration in Enhancing Maritime Vocational Training for Deck Officers : Systematic Literature  Review and Qualitative Analysis of Perspectives

Riyanto Riyanto; Cris Kuntadi; Larsen Barasa; Irene Evi Krismawati; Yayu Nopriani Martha; Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.181

Authors

Riyanto Riyanto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Cris Kuntadi Universitas Bayangkara Jakarta
Larsen Barasa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Irene Evi Krismawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Yayu Nopriani Martha Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.181

Keywords:

Maritime Education, Deck Officer Training, Sustainability, STCW Competencies, Simulation-Based Training

Abstract

The growing complexity of maritime operations demands deck officers with advanced competencies and a strong understanding of sustainability principles. This study addresses critical gaps in maritime vocational education by exploring the effectiveness of current training programs, the integration of sustainability, and the role of technology-driven approaches. While previous research has focused on technical skills aligned with STCW standards, limited attention has been paid to leadership, communication, and environmental education. The research sought to answer how maritime training can be enhanced to address these gaps. Using a systematic literature review and qualitative analysis of insights from maritime professionals, educators, and graduates, the study synthesized theoretical frameworks with real-world experiences. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires, analyzed using thematic coding, and triangulated with findings from the literature review. The results demonstrate strong technical training aligned with STCW standards but reveal fragmented sustainability integration and inadequate leadership preparation. Simulation-based training was identified as highly effective, though it requires support from mentorship and real-world experiences. The findings provide actionable recommendations for enhancing curricula, fostering industry-academic partnerships, and refining policies to better prepare deck officers for modern maritime challenges. This research offers a practical roadmap for transforming maritime education, ensuring safety, operational efficiency, and sustainability in global maritime operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrifoglio, R., Cannavale, C., Laurenza, E., & Metallo, C. (2017). How emerging digital technologies affect operations management through co-creation: Empirical evidence from the maritime industry. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1298–1306.

Baş, M., Er, I. D., Çiçek, I., & Sağ, O. K. (2002). ITUMF Maritime English education & training model.

Baylon, A. M., & Santos, V. (2011). The challenges in Philippine maritime education and training. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 34–43.

Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. In Maritime work law fundamentals: Responsible shipowners, reliable seafarers (pp. 422–639).

Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, cities, and global supply chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

de Água, P. M. G. B., da Silva Frias, A. D., Carrasqueira, M. de J., & Daniel, J. M. M. (2020). Future of maritime education and training: Blending hard and soft skills. Pomorstvo, 34(2), 345–353.

Dyagileva, O., Goridko, N., Popova, H., Voloshynov, S., & Yurzhenko, A. (2020). Ensuring sustainable development of education of future maritime transport professionals by means of network interaction.

Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2014). On a lookout beyond STCW: Seeking standards and context for the authentic assessment of seafarers. 15th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities, IAMU AGA 2014 - Looking Ahead: Innovation in Maritime Education, Training and Research, 77–86.

House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: For STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.

Lau, Y., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2015). The motivations and expectations of students pursuing maritime education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 14, 313–331.

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.

Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 806–815.

Prokopenko, O., & Miśkiewicz, R. (2020). Perception of "green shipping" in the contemporary conditions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 269.

Pu, S., & Lam, J. S. L. (2021). Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: A conceptual framework. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(6), 777–794.

Sharma, A. (2023). Potential of technology-supported competence development for maritime education and training.

Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.

Wilson, S. (2001). What is an Indigenous research methodology. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 175–179.

Xiao, G., Wang, Y., Wu, R., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2024). Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), 1728.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.

Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive revision of the STCW convention: An overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.