Competency Development, Sustainability Practices, and Industry Preparedness in Maritime Vocational Education

Winarno Winarno; Tri Cahyadi; Larsen Barasa; Aji Permana; Cris Kuntadi; Yayu Nopriani Martha; Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.180

Authors

Winarno Winarno Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Tri Cahyadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Larsen Barasa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Aji Permana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Cris Kuntadi Universitas Bayangkara Jakarta
Yayu Nopriani Martha Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.180

Keywords:

Maritime Vocational Education, Industry Preparedness, Sustainability Practices, Competency Development, Practical Training

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of maritime vocational education in preparing graduates to meet the evolving demands of the industry, focusing on competency development, sustainability integration, and practical readiness. The research addresses the increasing need for training programs to align with global industry standards while incorporating sustainable practices to manage environmental and operational challenges. By integrating insights from maritime professionals, educators, graduates, and regulatory officers, the study provides a comprehensive and grounded analysis. The research explores how maritime education equips graduates with industry-relevant skills and incorporates sustainability into training frameworks. Using a qualitative approach, the study involved interviews with 10 stakeholders and thematic analysis of their experiences. Findings indicate strong outcomes in practical readiness (score: 9.3/10), supported by immersive sea-going experiences and hands-on training. However, sustainability integration scored lower (8.6/10), highlighting the need for a greater emphasis on environmental practices and sustainable operations within curricula. The results underscore the significance of collaboration between educational institutions and industry professionals to ensure training aligns with real-world demands. This study offers valuable recommendations for curriculum design and sustainability practices, contributing to a well-prepared and environmentally conscious maritime workforce. The findings serve as a foundation for policy development, institutional strategies, and further research into vocational training and sustainable maritime operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baş, M., Er, I. D., Çiçek, I., & Sağ, O. K. (2002). ITUMF maritime English education & training model.

Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. In Marine navigation and safety of sea transportation: STCW, maritime education and training (MET), human resources and crew manning, maritime policy, logistics and economic matters (pp. 107–115).

Bolbot, V., Methlouthi, O., Chaal, M., Valdez, O., BahooToroody, A., Tsetkova, A., Hellström, M., Saarni, J., Virtanen, S., & Owen, D. (2022). Identification and analysis of educational needs for naval architects and marine engineers in relation to the foreseen context of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS).

Chen, X., Bai, X., & Xiao, Y. (2017). The application of E-learning in maritime education and training in China. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 11(2), 349–354.

Chirea-Ungureanu, C. (2021). Preparing for an unknown future. Autonomous ships versus position of the Maritime English/IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases (ME/IMO SMCPs) in maritime practice. How are we going to solve this problem? TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15.

Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. In Maritime work law fundamentals: Responsible shipowners, reliable seafarers (pp. 422–639).

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

Domingues, F. C. (2013). 907 Maritime history and maritime archaeology. In B. Ford, D. L. Hamilton, & A. Catsambis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of maritime archaeology (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336005.013.0039

Dyagileva, O., Goridko, N., Popova, H., Voloshynov, S., & Yurzhenko, A. (2020). Ensuring sustainable development of education of future maritime transport professionals by means of network interaction.

Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2017). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Routledge.

House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: For STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.

Kaliszewski, A., Kozłowski, A., Dąbrowski, J., & Klimek, H. (2020). Key factors of container port competitiveness: A global shipping lines perspective. Marine Policy, 117, 103896.

Kim, J.-K., & Park, S.-H. (2019). A study on improvement of maritime education by aging seamen. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, 25(7), 874–880.

Senior, W. (1952). The history of maritime law. The Mariner’s Mirror, 38(4), 260–275.

Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.

Xiao, G., Wang, Y., Wu, R., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2024). Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), 1728.

Zhang, Y. (2023). Maritime law in motion: Book review. HeinOnline.