A Qualitative Analysis and Systematic Literature Review in Enhancing Leadership Competencies for Sustainable Maritime  Practices in Vocational Training

Tri Cahyadi; Winarno Winarno; Riyanto Riyanto; Larsen Barasa; Titis Ari Wibowo; Cris Kuntadi; Irene Evi Krismawati; Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.179

Authors

Tri Cahyadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Winarno Winarno Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Riyanto Riyanto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Larsen Barasa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Titis Ari Wibowo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Cris Kuntadi Universitas Bayangkara Jakarta
Irene Evi Krismawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i1.179

Keywords:

Maritime Education, Leadership Competencies, Green Shipping, Vocational Training, Sustainability

Abstract

The maritime industry is facing a critical shift toward sustainability, particularly through the green shipping transition. This research was conducted to explore how maritime vocational programs are developing leadership competencies necessary to manage sustainable maritime practices. Previous studies have largely focused on technical skills, with limited attention to leadership development in the context of sustainability. This research aims to fill this gap by addressing the preparedness of maritime education in cultivating leaders who can drive the green transition. The study sought to answer key questions about how leadership competencies are integrated into vocational training and the extent to which sustainability is incorporated into maritime curricula. The analysis utilized a combination of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and qualitative interviews with 10 maritime professionals, lecturers, and graduates. The SLR identified key competencies and frameworks in sustainable leadership, while the interviews provided insights into the current state of maritime education. The results indicate that while sustainability is increasingly recognized, there are gaps in leadership training, practical exposure to green technologies, and industry collaboration. The findings suggest that maritime vocational programs must adopt a more integrated approach to leadership development and sustainability. By embedding sustainability across curricula and providing hands-on learning opportunities, educational institutions can better prepare future maritime leaders. This research contributes to improving maritime education by addressing the intersection of leadership and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baş, M., Er, I. D., Çiçek, I., & Sağ, O. K. (2002). ITUMF maritime English education & training model.

Baylon, A. M., & Santos, V. (2011). The challenges in Philippine maritime education and training. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 34–43.

Booth, A., James, M.-S., Clowes, M., & Sutton, A. (2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review.

Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. In Maritime work law fundamentals: Responsible shipowners, reliable seafarers (pp. 422–639).

Connolly, M., James, C., & Fertig, M. (2019). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 504–519.

Demirel, E. (2020). Maritime education and training in the digital era. Universal Journal of Educational Research.

Fang, S., Wang, Y., Gou, B., & Xu, Y. (2019). Toward future green maritime transportation: An overview of seaport microgrids and all-electric ships. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(1), 207–219.

Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Roumpis, E. (2022). Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), 11.

House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: For STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.

Hui, Z., & Ishak, N. A. B. (2022). A review of maritime English teaching curriculum in China. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 13(15), 5–12.

Kaliszewski, A., Kozłowski, A., Dąbrowski, J., & Klimek, H. (2020). Key factors of container port competitiveness: A global shipping lines perspective. Marine Policy, 117, 103896.

Kidd, R., & McCarthy, E. (2019). Maritime education in the age of autonomy. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 187, 221–230.

Kim, J.-K., & Park, S.-H. (2019). A study on improvement of maritime education by aging seamen. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, 25(7), 874–880.

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042.

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.

Maher, D. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ digital competencies to support school students’ digital literacies. In Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership (pp. 29–46). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1461-0.ch002

Manning, G., & Curtis, K. (2019). The art of leadership. McGraw-Hill Education.

Norris, S. E. (2021). The development of the entrepreneurial mindset, critical thinking skills, and critical reflective practices through experiential learning activities in graduate business school. In Research anthology on developing critical thinking skills in students (pp. 210–231). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch013

Norton, J., & Packard, G. (2009). The Center for Character and Leadership Development at the United States Air Force Academy: Why this, why now? Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 1(1).

Pantouvakis, A., & Vlachos, I. (2020). Talent and leadership effects on sustainable performance in the maritime industry. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102440.

Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33.

Prokopenko, O., & Miśkiewicz, R. (2020). Perception of "green shipping" in the contemporary conditions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 269.

Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.

Wahl, A. M., & Kongsvik, T. (2018). Crew resource management training in the maritime industry: A literature review. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 377–396.

Xiao, G., Wang, Y., Wu, R., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2024). Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), 1728.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.

Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive revision of the STCW Convention: An overview. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 26, 1.

Zaderei, A. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises. Access: Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(2), 146–156.

Zhen, L., Wu, Y., Wang, S., & Laporte, G. (2020). Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 139, 388–410.