Enhancing Pedagogical Skills and Industry Knowledge for Maritime Instructors through Applied Management Studies

April Gunawan; Tri Cahyadi; Larsen Barasa; Jay Singgih; Wardoyo Dwi Kurniawan; Geboy Geboy

doi:10.61132/digitalinnovation.v1i4.108

Authors

April Gunawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Tri Cahyadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Larsen Barasa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Jay Singgih Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Wardoyo Dwi Kurniawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Geboy Geboy Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v1i4.108

Keywords:

Maritime Education, Teacher Training, Industry Knowledge, Applied Management, Vocational Programs, Maritime Instructor Development

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of enhancing teacher training and development programs for maritime instructors by focusing on improving both pedagogical skills and industry knowledge. The research explores applied management strategies in the fields of port, shipping, and logistics, aligning them with industry-specific educational needs. Qualitative perspectives from 5 maritime professionals, 5 lecturers, and 5 graduates working in maritime sectors were analyzed through descriptive analysis. The study aims to understand how maritime instructors can effectively integrate technical, promotional, marketing, and innovative skills into their teaching practices to better prepare students for the maritime industry. The data collection was conducted through structured interviews, observations, and focus group discussions. Findings indicate that improving teacher training not only enhances instructor competencies but also bridges the gap between maritime education and industry requirements. Key indicators include the effectiveness and efficiency of the training programs, with a performance score of 9/10 based on qualitative assessment. The paper discusses the implications for maritime vocational education, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement in instructor development. The study concludes with recommendations for further enhancing maritime teacher training programs by incorporating modern management practices and technological advancements to ensure that maritime education stays relevant to industry demands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. In Marine navigation and safety of sea transportation: STCW, maritime education and training (MET), human resources and crew manning, maritime policy, logistics and economic matters (pp. 107–115).

Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. In Maritime work law fundamentals: Responsible shipowners, reliable seafarers (pp. 422–639).

Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in the maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.040

Colley, H., James, D., Diment, K., & Tedder, M. (2003). Learning as becoming in vocational education and training: Class, gender, and the role of vocational habitus. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200183

House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: For STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.

Katz, J. (2015). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. Méthod(e)s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 1(1–2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.4314/meth.v1i1-2.11

Klotz, V. K., Billett, S., & Winther, E. (2014). Promoting workforce excellence: Formation and relevance of vocational identity for vocational educational training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-014-0005-8

Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges, and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0122-2

Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE Publications.

Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. In Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference (pp. 1-10). Haugesund, Norway.

Toriia, T. G., Epikhin, A. I., Panchenko, S. V., & Modina, M. A. (2023). Modern educational trends in the maritime industry. SHS Web of Conferences, 164, 60. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/2023164060

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-3435.12024

Zaderei, A. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises. Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.29013/asbide-1-2-146-156