The Role of Trust to Leading and Psychological Empowerment on Innovative Work Behavior in Knowledge Sharing Mediation for Batik Tulis MSME Workers

Elfia Nora; Sopiah Sopiah; Imam Bukhori

doi:10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i3.79

Authors

Elfia Nora Universitas Negeri Malang
Sopiah Sopiah Universitas Negeri Malang
Imam Bukhori Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i3.79

Keywords:

Trust To Leading, Leadership and Psychological Empowerment, Innovative Work Behavior, Batik Tulis UMKM Workers

Abstract

Trust to leading, psychological empowerment, and knowledge sharing can give rise to innovative work behavior of workers, especially workers in Batik Tulis MSMEs. Research Objectives: Trust to leading (1) To test the influence of Trust to leading on knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (2) to test the influence of Psychological empowerment on knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (3) the influence of Trust to leading on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (4) to test the influence of Psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (5) to examine the influence of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME Workers, (6) to examine the influence of Trust to leading on innovative work behavior through knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (7) to examine the influence of Psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior through knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers. The research is quantitative research with a sample of 75 workers in Batik Tulis MSMEs. The results showed that (1) there is a direct and significant influence of Trust to leading on knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (2) there is a direct and significant influence of Psychological empowerment on knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (3) there is a direct and significant influence of Trust to leading on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (4) there is a direct and significant influence of Psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (5) there is a direct and significant influence of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior in Batik Tulis MSME Workers, (6) there is an indirect influence of Trust to leading on innovative work behavior through knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers, (7) there is an indirect influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior through knowledge sharing in Batik Tulis MSME workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 267–299). Academic Press.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.

Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://epaper.mediaindonesia.com/detail/saatnya-internasionalisasi-umkm.

Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. P. C., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750–768.

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.

Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X

Kalargiros, E. M., & Manning, M. R. (2015). Divergent thinking and brainstorming in perspective: Implications for organization change and innovation. In Research in Organizational Change and Development. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kang, Y. J., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, H.-W. (2017). A psychological empowerment approach to online knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.039

Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., & Islam, T. (2021). Leading the innovation: Role of trust and job crafting as sequential mediators relating servant leadership and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1547–1568.

Khorakian, A., Mohammadi Shahroodi, H., Jahangir, M., & Nikkhah Farkhani, Z. (2019). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: The roles of ethical and knowledge sharing behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2), 164–173.

Kim, H.-W., & Gupta, S. (2014). A user empowerment approach to information systems infusion. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(4), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2014.2354693

Kim, S. L. (2019). Enticing high performers to stay and share their knowledge: The importance of trust in leader. Human Resource Management, 58, 341–351.

Kmieciak, R., Michna, A., & Meczynska, A. (2012). Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211232280

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

Liang, W., Lv, C., Yu, Y., Li, T., & Liu, P. (2022). Leader’s implicit followership and employees’ innovative behavior: Chain mediation effect of leader–member exchange and psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815147

Mutonyi, B. R. (2021). Employees’ psychological capital and innovative behavior in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(2), 198–215.

Pian, Q. Y., Jin, H., & Li, H. (2019). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative behavior: The moderating role of collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1652–1672.

Sjabadhyni, B., & Mustika, M. D. (2018). What millennials want: How to optimize their work. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 3(1), 1–16.

Slatten, T., Lien, G., Horn, C. M. F., & Pedersen, E. (2019). The links between psychological capital, social capital, and work-related performance: A study of service sales representatives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(1), 195–209.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/25686

Tang, Y., Shao, Y. F., & Chen, Y. J. (2019). Assessing the mediation mechanism of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on innovative behavior: The perspective of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12.

Tian, Q., & Sanchez, J. I. (2017). Does paternalistic leadership promote innovative behavior? The interaction between authoritarianism and benevolence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(5), 235–246.

van den Hooff, B., & de Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675

van den Hooff, B., Schouten, A. P., & Simonovski, S. (2012). What one feels and what one knows: The influence of emotions on attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211198990

Xue, Y., et al. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119709

Zeraati, H., Rajabion, L., Molavi, H., & Navimipour, N. J. (2019). A model for examining the effect of knowledge sharing and new IT-based technologies on the success of the supply chain management systems. Kybernetes, 49(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2018-0280