Bureaucratic Innovation and Public Service Delivery: Breaking Through Administrative Barriers in the Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v3i1.696Keywords:
Administrative Reform, Bureaucratic Innovation, Digital Government, Digital Transformation, E-governmentAbstract
Bureaucracies worldwide face increasing pressure to innovate due to rising citizen expectations, technological disruption, and fiscal constraints. The digital era offers significant opportunities to transform public service delivery by overcoming traditional administrative barriers. This study employs a multiple case study design, analyzing 18 innovative public service initiatives in Indonesia recognized for service innovation. Data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and direct observations. Using Innovation Diffusion Theory and Institutional Theory, the study examines innovation adoption, implementation, and sustainability. The findings show that successful bureaucratic innovations share six key characteristics: strong leadership, citizen-centric design, effective use of digital technologies, incremental implementation, institutionalization through regulations, and external partnerships. However, major barriers include rigid regulations, risk-averse organizational culture, fragmented authority, limited resources, inadequate digital infrastructure, and political influences. Digital technology plays a crucial enabling role, yet it must be supported by organizational change, capacity building, and cultural transformation. This study provides policy recommendations to support regulatory reform, strengthen innovation systems, and foster innovation-friendly public sector environments.
Downloads
References
Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00450.x
Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0891
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
Borins, S. (2014). The persistence of innovation in government. Brookings Institution Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Government of Indonesia. (2018). Presidential regulation No. 95 of 2018 on electronic-based government systems. State Secretariat.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: A case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. (2023). Kompetisi inovasi pelayanan publik 2023: Panduan dan hasil. Kementerian PANRB.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
OECD. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
OECD. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, 03. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01972.x
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. In A. Van de Ven & W. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior (pp. 19–75). Wiley.
United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. UN DESA. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210019026
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia public expenditure review: Spending for better results. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1490-8
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Zuurmond, A. (1994). De infocratie: Een theoretische en empirische heroriëntatie op Weber's ideaaltype in het informatietijdperk [The infocracy: A theoretical and empirical reorientation of Weber's ideal type in the information age]. Phaedrus.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ePaper Bisnis : International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
