The Role of TikTok Shop Influencers through "Toxic" Content in Triggering Impulse Buying among Generation Z for Fast Fashion Product
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v3i1.691Keywords:
Generation Z, Impulse Buying, Influencer Marketing, Social Commerce, Toxic ContentAbstract
The rapid growth of TikTok Shop as a social commerce platform has led to the emergence of 'toxic content' produced by influencers as a marketing tactic that effectively influences Generation Z's shopping behavior. This study investigates the role of TikTok Shop influencers and their 'toxic content' in stimulating impulse buying behavior among Generation Z consumers in the fast fashion sector, focusing on the psychological mechanisms involved, the most frequently purchased product categories, and the broader impacts of these consumption patterns. A qualitative research approach with a phenomenological design was used, and data were gathered through in-depth interviews with eight informants: six Generation Z consumers aged 19–24 years and two active TikTok Shop fashion influencers, selected via purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). Findings show that 'toxic content' acts as a stimulus within the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) theoretical framework, triggering impulse buying within minutes by evoking positive emotions and urgency. The Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) mechanism, driven by emotional triggers like time scarcity, social proof, and exclusivity, was the most dominant psychological factor. The most commonly purchased items were tops, coordinated sets, aesthetic bottoms, locally-made footwear, and accessories. The effects of 'toxic content' are financial, psychological, social, and environmental. This study advances influencer marketing literature and provides insights into Generation Z’s consumer behavior in the social commerce age.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brock, A., Mertens, D., & Dunn, D. (2018). The role of financial literacy in the 21st century classroom: Strategies for enhancing financial literacy education. Journal of Financial Education, 44(1), 12–24.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Ernest, P. (2019). The role of cultural context in mathematics education: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Educational Research, 68(4), 15–30.
Ginsburg, H., Klein, J., & Suggate, J. (2016). Integrating financial literacy and mathematics education: A dual approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(3), 353–369.
Heeks, R. (2003). Most e-government-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? iGovernment Working Paper Series. University of Manchester.
Jabbour, M., & Alqassab, M. (2019). The importance of local context in mathematics education: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.11.005
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(S1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable, and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
National Financial Educators Council. (2020). The importance of financial literacy in education: A comprehensive guide to integrating financial education in the classroom. National Financial Educators Council.
OECD. (2016). The role of financial literacy in shaping a financially capable society. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258769-en
OECD. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results. OECD Publishing.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Pollitt, C. (2010). Technological change: A central yet neglected feature of public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
Suyanto, S. (2017). Pendidikan matematika berbasis konteks lokal: Meningkatkan relevansi pembelajaran di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 142–155.
Tobias, S., & Dempsey, M. (2017). Financial literacy and decision-making in mathematics education. International Journal of Financial Education, 18(3), 123–140.
Williams, A., & Davis, L. (2018). Financial literacy in education: The importance of integrating financial education with mathematics curriculum. Journal of Economic Education, 49(2), 80–97.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ePaper Bisnis : International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
