Auditor Ethics, Auditor Competence, and Audit Risk: The Mediating Role of Audit Fees on Audit Quality among Auditors in Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya

Authors

  • Sausan Nada Salsabila Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Tri Ratnawati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v2i4.660

Keywords:

Audit Fee, Audit Quality, Audit Risk, Auditor Competence, Auditor Ethics

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of auditor ethics, auditor competence, and audit risk on audit quality, with audit fees serving as a mediating variable. This research employs a quantitative associative approach with a casual explanatory design. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey administered to external auditors working at Public Accounting Firms (PAFs) in Surabaya, with a population of 55 firms. The sampling technique used was convenience sampling, resulting in 42 auditors as respondents with the characteristic of having worked at Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya for at least one year as of 2025. Data analysis was conducted using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method assisted by SmartPLS 4.0 software. The results indicate that auditor competence and audit risk have a positive and significant effect on audit fees, while auditor ethics does not have a significant effect. Furthermore, auditor ethics has a positive and significant effect on audit quality, whereas auditor competence, audit risk, and audit fees do not show a significant effect. In addition, audit fees are not proven to function as a mediating variable and therefore are unable to mediate the effects of auditor ethics, auditor competence, and audit risk on audit quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agoes, S. (2021). Auditing: Petunjuk praktis pemeriksaan akuntan oleh kantor akuntan publik (Edisi ke-5, Vol. 1). Salemba Empat.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al Farishi, R. R., & Salim, S. (2025). Audit risk, professional skepticism, and audit quality: The moderating role of utilization of information technology. Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.55324/enrichment.v3i3.375

Al Radhi, A. E. J., & Abdulahad, A. F. (2023). The impact of the audit profession risks in improving audit quality (An applied study in the general company for electric power production/southern region). American Journal of Business Management, Economics and Banking, 13, 1–10.

Alsughayer, S. A. (2021). Impact of auditor competence, integrity, and ethics on audit quality in Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Accounting, 10(4), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2021.104011

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services (16th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Boynton, W. C., Johnson, R. E., & Kell, W. G. (2003). Modern auditing (7th ed., Vol. 1). Erlangga.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Djamaa, W., Triastuti, Y., & Tami, P. D. (2023). Pengaruh fee audit, kompetensi, etika auditor, dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap kualitas audit pada kantor akuntan publik di Depok dan Jakarta tahun 2020. El-Mal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi & Bisnis Islam, 4(1), 120–146.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021a). Kode etik profesi akuntan publik (KEPAP) 2021.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021b). Standar audit 200 (Revisi 2021): Tujuan keseluruhan auditor independen dan pelaksanaan audit berdasarkan standar audit. http://www.iapi.or.id

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021c). Standar audit 330 (Revisi 2021): Respons auditor terhadap risiko yang telah dinilai. http://www.iapi.or.id

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2024a). Peraturan Dewan Pengurus Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 tentang panduan penentuan imbalan jasa audit laporan keuangan.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2024b). Standar audit 315 (Revisi): Pengidentifikasian dan penilaian risiko kesalahan penyajian material. http://www.iapi.or.id

International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators. (2025a). 2024 survey of inspection findings. https://www.ifiar.org

International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators. (2025b). IFIAR member directory. https://www.ifiar.org/members/member-directory/

Iqbal, M., & Santika, E. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor, etika profesi auditor, dan fee audit terhadap kualitas audit pada kantor akuntan publik di wilayah Antapani dan Cikutra Bandung. Akurat: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 15(1), 73–88.

Karini, R. S. R. A., Suprayitno, D., Sihwinarti, D., Sunny, M. P., Saraswathi, I. A. A., Suharti, S., Amrita, N. D. A., Dewi, I. A. S., Pratama, O. S. P., & Gede, I. K. (2024). Buku ajar audit manajemen. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Lamaya, F., Pandin, M. Y. R., & Ratnawati, T. (2025). Audit quality, firm value, and audit opinion in Indonesian state-owned enterprises. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(6), 1451–1464. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i6.8173

Mulyadi. (2017). Auditing (Edisi ke-6, Vol. 1). Salemba Empat.

Muslim, Rahim, S., Pelu, M. F. A., & Pratiwi, A. (2020). Kualitas audit: Ditinjau dari fee audit, risiko audit, dan skeptisme profesional auditor sebagai variabel moderasi. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 8(1), 9–19. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/EKU

Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, H. L., Le, T. N., & Tran, N. B. H. (2024). The influence of auditor ethics on audit quality: Analyzing key factors in Vietnamese audit firms. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(7), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.07.025

Nursasi, E., Bunyamin, & Ristiana, A. P. (2023). Analisis fee audit, audit tenure, dan profesionalisme auditor terhadap kinerja auditor di KAP Kota Malang. Jurnal Manajemen Dirgantara, 16(1), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.56521/manajemen-dirgantara.v16i1.922

Rahmi, N. U., Hadi, T., Susilawati, Widia, & Fredy, A. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi, akuntabilitas, penerapan kode etik, dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kualitas audit di KAP di Medan. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i2.414

Rai, I. G. A. (2008). Audit kinerja pada sektor publik: Konsep, praktik, dan studi kasus. Salemba Empat.

Ratnasari, H. D. (2021). The effect of abnormal audit fee on audit quality. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa/v5i1.1514

Setyana, H. D., Rono, S., & Nuraini, F. (2021). Pengalaman kerja auditor, etika auditor, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit pada kantor akuntan publik. Sustainable, 1(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.30651/stb.v1i1.9765

Subiyantoro. (2025). Dampak karakteristik tim audit, independensi, kompetensi, dan fee audit terhadap kualitas audit: Dampak mediasi proses audit efektif. Akurasi: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.36407/akurasi.v7i2.1700

Sucipto, & Agustina, T. (2022). Pengaruh risiko audit terhadap kualitas audit melalui fee audit pada KAP di Jakarta. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 23(2). http://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/jap

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian bisnis: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syafriadi, E., & Gultom, P. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap kualitas audit dengan mediasi fee audit dan moderasi etika audit di KAP Drs. Syamsul Bahri MM., Ak dan Rekan. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JEBMA), 4(3), 2111–2130. https://doi.org/10.47709/jebma.v4i3.4865

Van, H. N., Thanh, H. P., Thanh, C. N., Ngoc, D. N., & Hai, G. H. (2022). Study on factors affecting audit fees and audit quality through auditors’ perceptions: Evidence from an emerging economy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.39

Wooten, T. C. (2003). Research about audit quality. CPA Journal, 73(1), 48–51.

Yulanda, N., Ladewi, Y., & Yamaly, F. (2021). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, etika profesi, dan risiko audit terhadap kualitas audit (Survei pada kantor akuntan publik di Kota Palembang). JAK: Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.37058/jak.v1i2.6725

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Nada Salsabila, S., & Tri Ratnawati. (2025). Auditor Ethics, Auditor Competence, and Audit Risk: The Mediating Role of Audit Fees on Audit Quality among Auditors in Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya. EPaper Bisnis : International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management , 2(4), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v2i4.660