The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use and Security on QRIS Usage Decisions Among the Community in Lampung Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i4.145Keywords:
Perceived ease of use, Security, Usage decisions, QRISAbstract
Payment system developments brought about by technological advancements to date have resulted in a variety of cashless transactions, including card-based and application-based (server) electronic money. Bank Indonesia launched QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard), an application-based non-cash payment system that addresses community demands. Finding out how perceived ease of use and security affect QRIS usage decisions in the Lampung Province Community is the goal of this study. This study is quantitative and employs a survey approach, distributing a questionnaire to 140 Lampung Province residents who have used QRIS to make payments. The study's findings suggest that decisions about usage are significantly influenced by perceivedease of use and security in transactions.
Downloads
References
Aprianti, D., Alhadi, E., & Badri, M. (2023). The effect of convenience and security on customer decisions in using QRIS Livin’ by Mandiri at Bank Mandiri. Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 3(2), 65–73. http://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/jtiemb
Aryawati, N. P. A., Mahardika, I. M. N. O., & Wibawa, I. G. J. S. (2022). Persepsi pengguna QRIS pada UMKM di Kota Mataram. Guna Sewaka, 1(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.53977/jgs.v1i2.668
Bank Indonesia. (2020). Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). www.bi.go.id
Fadhilah, S. A., Nugroho, J. A., & Sangka, K. B. (2021). Pengaruh kemudahan dan keamanan terhadap minat menggunakan Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard pada pelaku UMKM binaan Bank Indonesia KPW Solo. BISE: Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 7(3), 1–7.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Houston, D. D. (2020). Adopsi penerimaan digital payment pada kalangan milenial. Medium, 7(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.2019.vol7(2).4094
Ibrahim, M. (2023). Perbanas ungkap kendala pembayaran QRIS di Indonesia. Infobanknews.com. https://infobanknews.com/perbanas-ungkap-kendala-pembayaran-qris-di-indonesia/
Kamil, I. (2020). Cashless society: The effect of financial ability, ease, and security on behavior of the use of financial technology system. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 20(3), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2020/v20i330328
Kotler, K., & Keller, P. (2017). Manajemen pemasaran (Edisi 13 Jilid 1). PDFDrive.
Mudah Indonesia. (2024). Lima tantangan utama dalam bertransaksi dengan QRIS dan cara mengatasi. Mudahindonesia.com. https://mudahindonesia.com/blog/5-tantangan-utama-bertransaksi-dengan-qris/
Ningsih, H. A., Sasmita, E. M., & Sari, B. (2021). Persepsi risiko terhadap keputusan menggunakan uang elektronik (QRIS) pada mahasiswa. Jurnal IKRA-ITH Ekonomika, 4(1), 1–9.
Nurhapsari, R., & Sholihah, E. (2022). Analysis of the factors of intention to use QRIS for MSMEs in Semarang City’s traditional market. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 18(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.21067/jem.v18i2.7291
Prima. (2024). Kendala yang mungkin kamu hadapi dengan QRIS dan apa solusinya? Jaringanprima.co.id. https://www.jaringanprima.co.id/id/kendala-yang-mungkin-kamu-hadapi-dengan-qris-dan-apa-solusinya
Rahardyan, A. (2024). Marak kasus penyalahgunaan QRIS, merchant dan konsumen harus lebih teliti. Bisnis.com. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20240611/563/1773277/marak-kasus-penyalagunaan-qris-merchant-dan-konsumen-harus-lebih-teliti
Rahmawati, S., & Arfiansyah, M. A. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan penggunaan QRIS pada UMKM Kota Surakarta. MBIA, 22(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.33557/mbia.v22i3.2663
Ridwan, M. A., & Dharma, F. (2022). Factors affecting the use of Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(1).
Riswanda, F. (2023). Pending transaksi QRIS menggunakan LinkAja. Mediakonsumen.com. https://mediakonsumen.com/2023/11/24/surat-pembaca/pending-transaksi-qris-menggunakan-linkaja
Saputri, O. B. (2020). Consumer preferences in using the Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS) as a digital payment tool. Journals of Economics and Business Mulawarman, 17(2), 237–247.
Sati, R. A. S., & Ramaditya, M. (2020). Effect of perception of benefits, easy perception of use, trust and risk perception towards interest using e-money (case study of consumers who use the Metland card). Management, 11, 1–19.
Schiffman, L. G., Lazar, L., & Kanuk, L. (2012). Perilaku konsumen (Edisi 2). Jakarta: PT. Indeks Gramedia.
Setiawan, I. W. A., & Mahyuni, L. P. (2021). QRIS di mata UMKM: Eksplorasi persepsi dan intensi UMKM menggunakan QRIS. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 1(1), 922–946.
Siyoto, S., & Sodik, A. (2015). Dasar metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tim Bank Mega Syariah. (2024). Kenali modus penipuan QRIS dan cara menghindarinya. Megasyariah.co.id. https://www.megasyariah.co.id/id/artikel/edukasi-tips/digital-banking/penipuan-qris
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ePaper Bisnis : International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
