Total Risk and Its Impact on Firm Performance and Sustained Growth: Empirical Evidence from Consumer Non-Cyclicals Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Elia Rossa Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Nurasia Natsir Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Pelamonia Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/greeninflation.v3i2.710

Keywords:

CAPM, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Firm Performance, Sustained Growth, Systematic Risk

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of total risk on firm performance and sustained growth among consumer non-cyclicals manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the period 2019–2023. Total risk is operationalized through the systematic risk proxy (Beta/β), estimated via the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) framework as the covariance between individual stock returns and the market return divided by the variance of market returns, using the Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) as the market benchmark. Firm performance is measured through Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q, while sustained growth is operationalized following Gerson et al. (2025) as SG = b × ROE, where b denotes the earnings retention ratio. Panel data regression analysis is applied to 225 firm-year observations drawn from 45 companies, with model selection guided by the Chow and Hausman specification tests. The Fixed Effect Model (FEM) is adopted for ROA, ROE, and SG, while the Random Effect Model (REM) is applied for Tobin’s Q. Results indicate that systematic risk exerts a significant negative effect on ROA (β = −0.312; p < 0.01) and ROE (β = −0.278; p < 0.01), but is statistically non-significant for Tobin’s Q, suggesting that capital market pricing in Indonesia does not fully incorporate systematic risk information. Critically, systematic risk exerts the largest and most significant negative effect on sustained growth (β = −0.347; p < 0.01), revealing a dual transmission mechanism through which risk suppresses ROE while simultaneously inducing more conservative dividend policies, both of which constrain long-run growth sustainability. These findings carry important implications for corporate risk management strategy and empirically enrich the literature on risk, performance, and growth in emerging capital markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amouzesh, N., Moeinfar, Z., & Mousavi, Z. (2011). Sustainable growth rate and firm performance: Evidence from Iran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(23), 249–255.

Arhinful, R., & Radmehr, M. (2023). The impact of financial leverage on the financial performance of the firms listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231204099. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231204099

Bartram, S. M., Brown, G. W., & Conrad, J. (2011). The effects of derivatives on firm risk and value. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(4), 967–999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109011000275

Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2021). Investments (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, 21(3), 17–31.

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., Allen, F., & Edmans, A. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x

Gerson, J., Jooste, C., & Swanepoel, E. (2025). The determinants of sustainable growth in South African listed companies. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2025.0000001

Higgins, R. C. (1977). How much growth can a firm afford? Financial Management, 6(3), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665251

Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x

Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, A. H. (2020). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.097

Phan, D. H. B., Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, V. H. (2021). Systematic risk and firm performance: Evidence from ASEAN banking sector. Research in International Business and Finance, 56, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101387

Pujawan, I. N., & Bah, A. U. (2022). Supply chains under COVID-19 disruptions: Literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 23(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1932568

Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x

Tandelilin, E. (2010). Portofolio dan investasi: Teori dan aplikasi. Kanisius.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Elia Rossa, & Nurasia Natsir. (2026). Total Risk and Its Impact on Firm Performance and Sustained Growth: Empirical Evidence from Consumer Non-Cyclicals Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Green Inflation: International Journal of Management and Strategic Business Leadership, 3(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.61132/greeninflation.v3i2.710